Board of Zoning Appeals
Meeting Agenda
July 21, 2009
7:00 P.M.


I. CALL MEETING TO ORDER


II. ROLL CALL


III. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE


IV. MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF June 16, 2009


V. CORRESPONDENCE

a. Zoning Bulletin - May 25, 2009
b. Zoning Bulletin - June 10, 2009
c. Zoning Bulletin - June 25, 2009
           

VI. REPORTS

Report on Council – Randy Danbury
Report on Planning – David Okum


VII. CHAIRMAN’S STATEMENT AND SWEARING IN OF APPLICANTS


VIII. OLD BUSINESS

A. Withdraw variance request tabled from June 16, 2009 Board of Zoning Appeals meeting - The owner of 1083 Castro Lane requests a variance to allow the elimination of the garage. Said variance is from Section 153.105(B)”A single two-car garage and related parking area is required…”

IX. NEW BUSINESS

A. The owner of 399 Naylor Court requests a variance to erect a screen patio 9’-8” from the rear property line. Said variance is from Section 153.072(A)”Single household dwellings…shall have a minimum rear yard setback of 40 feet.”

B. The owner of 344 Peach Street requests a variance to allow a pool to be erected in the side yard. Said variance is from Section 153.488(C)(1) ”A swimming pool, bathhouse, tennis court or other accessory recreational facilities…shall be located 15 feet from the rear or side lot line.”

C. The owner of 85 West Kemper requests a variance to allow signage to be placed on the light poles. Said variance is from Section 153.531(D)(2) “Pole signs shall be limited to not more than one such sign…”

D. The owner of 1280 East Kemper requests a variance to allow signage to remain on the light poles. Said variance is from Section 153.531(D)(2) “Pole signs shall be limited to not more than one such sign…”

E. The owner of 33 West Kemper requests a variance to allow signage to remain on the light poles. Said variance is from Section 153.531(D)(2) “Pole signs shall be limited to not more than one such sign…”


X. DISCUSSION

XI. ADJOURNMENT