President of Council Marjorie Harlow called Council to order on December 3, 2008, at
7:00 p.m.
The governmental body and those in attendance recited the pledge of
allegiance.
Mrs. McNear took roll call. Present were Council members Danbury,
Diehl, Galster, Squires, Vanover, Wilson and Harlow.
The minutes of November 19, 2008 were approved with seven affirmative
votes.
NOMINATIONS FOR VICE-PRESIDENT OF COUNCIL
Mr. Squires nominated Mr. Vanover and Mr. Diehl nominated Mr. Danbury.
Mr. Vanover was elected by a 4-3 vote.
COMMUNICATIONS
Mrs. McNear stated we have several communications:
* a letter from the Government Finance Officers Association notifying us that the City has
received the CAFR (Comprehensive Annual Finance Report) for fiscal year ending December
31, 2007. This is the eighth year in a row for this award.
* Request from Wood & Lamping for an increase to the retainer.
* AT&T Customer Bill of Rights regarding the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio
relative to things such as resolving problems and disputes, formal complaints, privacy
options, repairing service, etc.
* Letter from Andrew Ciafardini, State representative in the 28th house district appointed
to replace Jim Raussen
* Letter from Duke Energy asking for an increase
* Letter from State Fire Marshall Division asking for names of board members for this
board
COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE AUDIENCE -
none
ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
ORDINANCE NO. 42-2008 “DECLARING A TOTALED POLICE CRUISER AS SURPLUS PROPERTY AND
AUTHORIZING THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR TO ADVERTISE, AUCTION AND ENTER INTO A CONTRACT FOR
SALE OF SAID VEHICLE AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY “
Mr. Vanover made a motion to adopt and Mr. Squires seconded.
Mr. Osborn said this is a 2007 Ford Crown Victoria that was involved in an accident. The
other operator was at fault. We received a settlement check from the other operator’s
insurance company in the amount of $22,012.53 and we have retained title to the damaged
vehicle. Now we are approaching you for authorization to sell the vehicle as salvage.
Ordinance 42-2008 passed with seven affirmative votes.
CITY FEES
Mayor Webster said in putting together the budget for 2009, Mr. Osborn issued a directive
to the department directors to submit a budget that was at least five percent less than
what was approved for the year 2008 and to anticipate that 2010 would also result in a
five percent reduction. In addition to that we asked the directors to look at their fee
schedules. Some of those fees are incorporated into the budget and some others are not in
the budget but we’d like you to consider them.
Mr. Osborn said Greg Karle met with staff to review fees from other
jurisdictions and we’ve asked Mr. Karle to walk us through the proposed changes.
Mr. Karle said we came up with nine policy changes and fee adjustments.
It’s our goal to maintain the high level of service and programming that we’ve
had in the past. We felt the only way to continue this is to grow our membership. The
economy is difficult for everyone so we wanted to minimize the impact to our residents.
Our membership fees have not increased since 2000. Our guest fees have not increased since
1977. We did benchmark against other similar facilities, such as other community centers
and YMCAs. Even with these changes were are still more reasonably priced than any of our
neighbors. We have proposed changing our business memberships to include those who work at
least 20 hours a week in Springdale, rather than 40 hours, and to increase the cap to 300
members. We propose raising the guest fee to $3.00 per person and that would give us an
increase of $11,000. We would have a family rate of $10 for four people. We propose a
non-resident sports fee of $25 per child. That would affect approximately 40 kids per
year. For many years we have provided the use of our gym to some of the area parochial
schools for gym classes, sports, etc. This fall one of those schools offered to pay a
rental fee that they had paid at other facilities. Our proposal is to charge $20 an hour
for the gym use. We are proposing to raise the meeting room rates $10 to a rate of $40 per
week day for five hours and $50 for six hours on the weekend. We propose to raise our
after hours supervisor fees to cover the cost of someone staying after hours to close up.
Mr. Karle stated we propose a $5 per family increase for pool
membership. The fitness membership will increase $20. Presently membership for seniors
over 62 years of age is free. The proposal is to begin charging $20 to new senior members
and in 2011 start charging current senior members. We also have non-resident senior
memberships that we have had for the past three years through a contract with LifeSphere.
We charge those people $20 a year. LifeSphere provides $100 subsidy. As that subsidy
disappears I would anticipate increasing those membership fees. The subsidy has a cap of
$30,000 this year; $20,000 in 2009 and $10,000 in 2010.
Mayor Webster said it is still $100 per head but they will subsidize us
for less members. On the flip side we are not getting new non-resident members.
Mr. Karle said we do not market those memberships; they are word of mouth. We do budget
$32,000 a year for senior programming and we do have a full-time programmer. We have
recommended allowing 100 non-resident memberships at $400 per family or $300 for a single.
We want to maintain our level of services and non-residents would bear the burden of the
increases.
Mayor Webster said we presented this to the Park & Recreation Commission. It would be
an increase of $101,000 if we generated these and they are in the budget for next year.
Mr. Danbury asked have you looked into a debit card program for pool concessions? Mr.
Karle answered we could look into that.
Mr. Vanover asked if a family is non-compliant do we have a non-renewal policy? Mr. Karle
replied that is handled on a more individual basis.
Mr. Diehl asked Mr. Karle, could you elaborate on the non-residence family membership?
Mr. Karle responded I believe there is a market for it. I believe we could fill the cap we
are looking for. I look for that as the largest and most significant amount of revenue
that could be generated. We estimated we could bring in as much as $35,000 in additional
revenue at the expense of 200 additional members to a community center. That allows us to
not increase our resident memberships significantly.
Mr. Diehl said I am not in favor of that even though I’m a great revenue enhancer. I
hate to see this turn into the Springdale YMCA. It’s one of the true benefits of
living in this community.
Mr. Karle said I think we have a significant differential in what a resident and
non-resident would pay. It is a substantial benefit for our residents and we want to
maintain that but part of this is help us maintain our level of service and current fees
for residents. That $35,000 will fund our part-time fitness staff for a year. I feel we
have the capacity to handle this.
Mayor Webster said I share your concern about one of the benefits of living in the City is
having an “exclusive” club for Springdale residents but in these economic times
we need to stretch a little bit. If this doesn’t work, if it overcrowds the facility,
etc. we don’t have to renew the memberships. If there is a bottleneck I think it
would be in the exercise area, but this money funds the entire part-time fitness staff for
a year. If we don’t increase the revenues down the road we will have to reduce the
level of service.
Mr. Osborn said we had this same concern when we introduced business memberships. We were
initially concerned about people competing for exercise equipment. We’ve had a
maximum of 200 business memberships and we’ve never reached that.
Mr. Diehl said when we started the business memberships I was on the Recreation Commission
and I voted for that. I thought it was a good plan at that time. How does the $400/$300
membership fee compare to the YMCA?
Mr. Karle said a YMCA membership is in the $800 to $900 a year range. Beyond that they
usually have an initiation fee the first year.
Mr. Galster said I don’t have a problem with raising the non-resident fees. I’m
more concerned about the non-residential sports fee because everyone pays the Youth
Boosters $25 to play. I understand my kids are paying for their membership fee at the
Community Center but normally we are bringing these children in to fill a team that allows
the rest of the kids to play. For $1,000 in a year I’d hate to not be able to fill
out complete sports teams. If employees are non-residents where do they fall in here?
Mr. Karle responded that employees of the City of Springdale are treated the same as
residents. I’m not concerned about the registration fees for sports teams being a
problem because our Youth Boosters have been able to keep the registration fees low
compared to other communities.
Mr. Parham said the employee membership is part of their benefit package. Mr. Karle said
employees can use the fitness center. They can pay for a family upgrade or to use the
pool.
Council voted in favor of the fees 6-1. Mr. Diehl voted no.
Mr. Osborn said the EMS fee is another fee we have not addressed in a long time. We are
behind everybody by a long way. The City also does not charge mileage. We don’t plan
to do that. For basic life support we charge $140 and for advanced life support we charge
$400. Medicount Management recommends that we increase our rates to $400 for basic life
support and $700 for advanced life support. The Medicare cap for advanced life support is
$365.89 so we already charge more than the cap for ALS services. Medicare billing only
accounts for 43% of our total collections. The other 57% is revenue we receive from
private insurance carriers so we would see an increase of 57% increase of our ALS runs and
100% of our BLS runs by this rate change. We anticipate that this will increase our
revenues next year by $130,000. When you look at what our neighbors are charging we are a
whole magnitude below everyone else. We recommend that these fees be increased for 2009.
Mr. Galster asked can you explain the difference between ALS1 and ALS2?
Mr. Osborn replied ALS2 is catastrophic trauma, very severe involvement where extreme
paramedic skills have to be used. We may get one or two of those a year.
Mr. Wilson asked why not charge mileage?
Mr. Osborn responded we are already proposing a big increase. It’s a big step to
increase the rates to the numbers recommended. Perhaps that is something we can visit in
the future.
Mr. Parham said Medicare really drives the industry on EMS runs. With Medicare that’s
all you are going to get. You can’t get anymore from other insurance companies. With
insurance you have a greater opportunity to collect the $400 and $700.
Mr. Vanover said I have a problem with the mileage charge. Having only one fire station I
would be penalized because I live in Heritage Hill.
Mr. Osborn replied no, they pick a central point in the City and calculate the mileage
from that central point to every hospital. The fee would be a flat fee for everyone.
Mrs. Harlow said some communities charge for use of equipment on expressways.
Mr. Osborn said we have not started doing that yet. If there is an auto accident and you
have to dispatch a pumper to the scene there is a movement underway to charge for that
pumper. I would rather not be the groundbreaker on things like that. I would prefer to see
it become more of an acceptable trend before we try to do it.
Council agreed to accept the increased EMS fees with a 7-0 vote.
Mr. Osborn said we will probably need legislation for you to amend the fees.
Mr. Osborn said the third item in your packet is for debris removal. We don’t have to
discuss this tonight. We have 162 runs this year that cost $165 per trip. We need to
recover some of that cost.
BUDGET DISCUSSION
Mayor Webster said the most important data in the letter is where you
look at the revenues. We had $20,977,000 budgeted. Our estimate today is $19.5 million.
That’s $1,400,000 shortfall for this year. That’s a decline in the overall
economy.
Mr. Wilson said some departments could not reach the five percent cut.
Mrs. Harlow asked are we still running high numbers in animal control?
Mayor Webster responded yes, we are. We are instituting a new policy
next year where you can use that service one time. After that you will have to pay. In
response to Mr. Galster, Mayor Webster stated at present we don’t have a limit to the
number of animals that can be caught, but there is a limit to the types of animals, just
rabies carrying animals.
Mr. Squires said there is a footnote saying that the testing program
has been discontinued but I thought we were going to continue that on a limited basis.
Mr. Osborn said we are eliminating some tests that don’t justify
themselves based upon the history. Certain plate tests never come up with a problem. We
will continue the program attacking those areas that create the most threat to the public
but it will be done with existing personnel.
Mr. Galster said based on the economy the way it is and the cost
savings we are trying to reach, I don’t know that we aren’t putting up too much
fireworks in a relatively short period of time. I think originally the fireworks package
for the Taste of Springdale was to create the attraction to a new event. I think the event
itself has been extremely successful and people will come up without fireworks. I’m
also not sure how much the buses are being used right now. I also believe the
advertisements and brochures going out from the Community Center could be consolidated or
put out over the internet. The fireworks are extras and I don’t see as many people
riding the buses.
Mayor Webster said we are taking a good look at the mailings we put out
at the Community Center and we have tried to collect as many e-mail addresses as we
possibly could get. That is the avenue we are going to use as much as possible going
forward although we will probably continue some of the senior mailings. As far as the
fireworks, I’m not a fireworks person. We can eliminate them from both events. I
don’t ride the buses but we don’t have a lot of parking and I would hate to
deter people because we don’t have parking.
Mr. Osborn said we had already cut back on the promotion of the 4th of
July event as well as the buses.
Mr. Wilson said Mr. Osborn will be looking at the budget quarterly, if
not monthly and if the revenue is not there he will be going back to the department
directors and we’ll see more cuts.
Mr. Galster said I like seeing the 4th of July fireworks. I think it is
appropriate but the Taste, it’s a little over the top.
Mayor Webster said if we are going to eliminate them we should
eliminate them from both events.
Mrs. Harlow asked is this something Parks and Recreation could look at
and see if something else could be done for the 4th of July to celebrate that holiday as
opposed to $14,000 in fireworks.
Mayor Webster said if we want to have an impact on those events
let’s do away with the fireworks.
Mrs. Harlow said between the two of them that would save $30,000 a
year.
Mr. Wilson said fireworks are tradition on the 4th of July. I can see
eliminating them for the Taste but everyone has them for the 4th of July. Maybe we cut it
to 12.5 minutes instead of 25 minutes.
Mayor Webster asked how many 4th of July festivals don’t have
alcohol?
Mr. Wilson responded if I go to a function that doesn’t have
alcohol that doesn’t bother me because I have alcohol at home should I choose to
drink it. If it’s going to be a family event like we’ve changed it to be, then
people come there knowing they’re not going to get the beer.
Mr. Galster said since the event was changed to a family event as
opposed to what it used to be, I think a lot of people who would like to have their
libations have stayed home and enjoyed the fireworks from home. A number of people
weren’t thrilled with the change but it was needed. I think that’s also the
decline in some of the bus riding as well. If I were voting to eliminate them I would keep
them for the 4th of July and eliminate them for the Taste.
Mr. Squires said I agree with Mr. Galster. If we are going to eliminate
any, I would eliminate the Taste and keep the 4th of July fireworks. It would also send a
message to the people that we are dong a pretty good job living within the budget and this
economy. I like the fireworks for the 4th of July. We can eliminate both of them but one
for sure.
Mr. Wilson said someone mentioned Parks and Recreation coming up with a
thought. Maybe we could entrust them to look at this. If we don’t have the budget Mr.
Osborn or Mayor Webster will come back and tell us.
Mr. Osborn stated I think we would prefer clear direction on this from
Council rather than throw it back to staff. We’ve made a recommendation. We’ve
tried to be as generous as possible with these special events while holding down costs. We
even talked internally about whether there was room for two events and we decided to save
both events. We eliminated what costs we could and still have a viable event. If Council
would prefer to eliminate fireworks we would prefer to hear that from you and if for only
one event, which one do you want us to have the fireworks?
Mr. Diehl said people are coming to the 4th for activities. For the
Taste we have businesses coming in and fireworks draw people to that event. I think we
have to look at the overall affect of people coming to those events. If we see a big
decrease, would there be a lot of restaurants that would not attend?
Mr. Squires said when the Finance Committee met we did not hesitate to
keep them both. I’d rather keep them both if one has to go I’d rather it be the
Taste.
Mr. Vanover said it’s tough but if I was going to eliminate one I
would eliminate the Taste. I agree with the tradition on the fourth. I don’t believe
the businesses come to the Taste for the fireworks. I think they come to the Taste for the
opportunity to display their wares and be part of the community.
Mayor Webster said I don’t want to minimize this but we are
talking about a $19 million budget and a $13,500 fireworks display. If the revenues
continue to fall as they have this year and it looks like we will come in another $1.4
million short we will probably be back here recommending no fireworks. If you want to
leave them both in we’ll have a pretty good handle on our revenue stream before the
Taste in September.
Mr. Danbury asked what percentage of the Taste is fireworks?
Mayor Webster replied they are about $13,500 each.
Mr. Danbury suggested eliminating the fireworks from the Taste.
Mayor Webster said if you want to take the $13,500 out for the Taste or the 4th or both,
we’ll do that.
Mrs. Harlow said most people would like the fireworks to remain on the 4th.
Mr. Wilson said I like the Mayor’s suggestion. It’s my
opinion not to cut anything out now. In three months we may have to cut something.
Let’s do it like this. The department has done what it was asked to do, reduce its
budget by five percent. We could leave it like it is for now because I’m sure Mr.
Osborn will be looking at the budget monthly and quarterly.
Mr. Squires said I agree with Mr. Wilson. That’s the gist of what
the committee felt. If it needs to be revised it will be revised. I can see Mr.
Galster’s point. In committee when we met to approve what we presented to you this
evening we had the idea we could possibly do both.
Mayor Webster stated all the department directors were asked to cut
their budget’s five percent. Mr. Karle’s budget was 7.43% less than what was
approved for 2008. It’s more than what was asked for but it doesn’t mean we
can’t cut it more. In addition, to the 7.43% he has also identified $101,000 in fee
increases which is not taken into consideration in the computation of the 7.43% savings.
Council agreed to leave both events in the budget and make changes
later if necessary.
Mr. Osborn said the Building Department did not make the five percent
cut. That’s because we have actually imposed more demands on them. We have asked them
to undertake the multi-family rental licensing program. In order to do that we are adding
two part-time people to this department and incurring other support costs to get that
program running. Bill McErlane is one of the most judicious people with money that we have
in our organization.
Mr. Galster said my question is actually about waste collection. Our
contract with Rumpke expires in the fall of 2009 with one alternate year option.
Mr. Osborn said we can’t believe we would be better off bidding
against a number that is three years old. We’ll pursue the option.
Mr. Osborn said Public Works is taking the deepest cut in personnel.
They have three retirements. We will try to accommodate the clerical vacancy by relocating
somebody who currently works for us down there or bringing that work up here and sharing
it among other folks here. The Assistant Public Works Director’s position will remain
vacant as will the crew leader position coming up due to retirement. There are three
departments that need to be protected, Police, Fire and Public Works so I expect the other
departments to step up because Public Works has done their bit.
Mr. Galster said we don’t have any extra grinding to do next year
because of the storm, do we?
Mr. Osborn said after our mulch sits all winter, in the spring we grind
it in the tub grinder to get it down to a particulate size suitable for mulch as opposed
to woodchips. We will tub grind twice as much stuff next year as we do in a typical year.
Mayor Webster said I’d like to call your attention to line item
52610 – Other Contracts. We have $143,000 in the budget. We have a $10,000
contribution to the Chamber and a $5,000 contribution to the Springdale Chamber. You all
need to be aware that my daughter is the Executive Director of the Springdale Chamber of
Commerce and has been for the last five or six years. This is the second or third year
that Mr. Tulloch has requested that a contribution be made to the local chamber. Since we
are doing $10,000 downtown he thinks it’s reasonable that we do $5,000 here. If any
of you have a problem with my daughter being the executive director who is hired and fired
and serves at the pleasure of the Chamber Board of Directors and not the Mayor, then you
should let it be known or forever hold your peace.
Mr. Galster stated I have no problem whatsoever with the work Julie has
done with the Chamber. However, if my wife, daughter or son worked somewhere and I was
writing an order to them I would have a problem with that, so I think there is a little
conflict here.
Mr. Wilson asked do we do performance reviews? Do we have a review or
tangible numbers to justify the expenditure?
Mayor Webster replied no.
Mr. Osborn said Finance Department did not make the full five percent
cut. This is our smallest department. It is pretty much payroll related to two full-time
people. Beyond that they buy some paper to put through the printers. It’s hard to
make those cuts when a department is mostly budgeted to full-time salaries it is hard to
make those cuts, particularly when we have factored in a 3½% raise for all full-time
people in the organization.
Mr. Galster said City Council has $25,000 for publications. I think
that is something that could be looked at.
Mr. Osborn said we are moving in this direction. We are in the process
of having the website for the Community Center redesigned so that it’s more
interactive. We are expanding beyond that. We are having someone from the Recreation
Department at our next Staff Meeting to discuss how we can expand this into other parts of
the City. One of the challenges I gave Greg Karle was to find a way to get the information
out without continuing to bulk up the City newsletter. We have expanded from eight to
twelve pages and a lot of it is trying to publish everything the Rec Center wants
published. I am hoping long term that we may be able to cut back to two newsletters a year
and have them come out electronically. That’s not to say we would have full and
immediate participation but if we put one on line and don’t publish it, we could see
what kind of response we get.
Mayor Webster said if there is one thing that this City does that I
constantly get compliments on it’s the City newsletter. I think there are a lot of
things in this budget that we ought to cut before we address the newsletter. We could try
to cut it back to four pages but I think it is something people use and it’s a way
for this government to communicate with the residents and I think we do a better job than
any community in the area. I think we are really doing a disservice to our residents if we
cut out or cut back on the newsletter.
Mrs. Harlow said when new people move into the area and they get that
newsletter they are tuned in to what’s going on, about getting permits, what City
services are.
Mr. Galster said I agree the newsletters are extremely informative. I
just think that by the time we have three from this department, three or four from the
Community Center, we could combine some of these.
Mr. Osborn said the Tax Department did not meet its five percent goal
either. If you look under Refunds, you will see in a $735,000 budget, $300,000 of that is
money the Tax Department has to refund to taxpayers. This is not an operating cost per se.
This is a cost based on the tax returns of the individuals. The cost per employee per man
hour isn’t affected by this. If you factor out the $300,000 they are well under five
percent.
Mr. Galster said the capital budget is extremely thin. I think we ought
to take a little time to let people know what those numbers are and let people know what
we have cut out of the capital budget.
Mr. Osborn said this year’s capital budget is $4.1 million. We
have tried to limit this budget to those items that are funded by State and Federal money.
Of the $4.1 million, $3.2 million is coming from outside the City so we really have
$900,000 in here. We had to eliminate those projects that did not have outside funding
such as improvements to the east leg of Kemper Road just east of Springfield Pike, the
ditch improvement at Glensprings on SR 4 and major repairs to the gabion walls in
Chamberlain Park that failed. Instead we budgeted for minor repairs to keep them from
getting worse. Longer term, we have not budgeted any future capital projects that require
local match because we have to anticipate that we will have to continue to make very hard
decisions about reducing our costs. The first thing that goes in situations like this is
capital expenses. You try to postpone them the best you can. That’s not to say we
won’t see a lot of activity next year. We will still see projects in 2009 and 2010
but those are projects that were in the pipeline for four or five years. Beyond that we
have one or two projects that are in the budget but other long term projects where we had
not applied for funding yet have been dropped. Our infrastructure is in darn good shape.
One caution I would make is that the street program has been cut back to $400,000.
I’m not sure that over the course of a five-year period that $400,000 a year is going
to be enough to keep the streets at the level they are right now.
Mayor Webster said I think Mr. Osborn did a marvelous job of leveraging our money at a 4-1
ratio. A City of our size is spending $900,000 of our money in capital improvements out of
a $19 million budget.
Mr. Wilson said it was not the intent of the Finance Committee to rush you through this
budget or to have you rubber stamp it. We appreciate as a committee the comments that have
been made. It shows that you’ve done your homework.
Mr. Osborn stated at your next meeting we will bring in a supplemental appropriation for
2008 to balance out departments and line items for current year expenses. We will bring in
a temporary appropriation ordinance for 2009 in order to get us through the first meeting
of the year. At the first meeting of 2009 we will bring this budget back in as an
appropriation ordinance.
Mr. Squires said there will be no reduction in staff. We will take care of that with
attrition.
Mayor Webster said there will be a reduction but it will be through attrition. At this
point we do not project laying off any of our workforce in 2009.
Mr. Osborn said even in this budget we have eliminated some part-time people and have cuts
hours for others. That will probably still continue into 2009 but full-time people are
being reduced through attrition.
OLD BUSINESS
-
none
NEW BUSINESS
Mayor Webster requested resolutions reappointing Kevin Ketring and Rita
Hart to new terms on the Board of Health.
Mr. Osborn said I’m sure you have all had the opportunity to try
to negotiate the temporary ramps on I-275. We’ve received quite a number of
complaints about that and we have been in direct contact with ODOT. We’ve expressed
in our strongest terms those same complaints made by the members of the public who called
us. We solicited from them some numbers for people to call in the event they want to talk
to someone from ODOT because it’s really not our project. I asked Don Shvegzda and
Jeff Agricola to drive those ramps and try to come up with some ideas to try to mitigate
the impact. In fairness this is not a static situation. Those ramps are going to be moved
back and forth as they change construction areas. I think we all have to appreciate that
there is a limit to what ODOT can do and still get the project built.
Mrs. McNear said I’d like to have that phone number because that
westbound entrance ramp is a death trap.
Mrs. McNear said Wood & Lamping is requesting an increase in
compensation for legal services starting January 1st.
Mr. Osborn said CDS has also submitted a similar proposal. Mr. Shvegzda
is meeting with Mr. Parham to go over the numbers and I would anticipate there would be a
recommendation at the next meeting.
MEETINGS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS
Board of Health
-
December 11, 2008
Planning Commission
-
December 9
Board of Zoning Appeals
-
December 16
COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE AUDIENCE - none
UPDATE ON LEGISLATION STILL IN DEVELOPMENT
Employee pay rate
-
December 17
Final appropriation and transfer ordinance
- December 17
Temporary appropriation
-
December 17
Agreement with ODOT for SR4 north of Glensprings
December 17
RECAP OF LEGISLATIVE ITEMS REQUESTED
Increased charges for EMS run
-
December 17
Board of Health reappointments
-
December 17
Increases for Wood & Lamping and CDS -
December 17
Council adjourned at 9:28 p.m.
Respectfully
submitted,
Kathy
McNear
Clerk
of Council/Finance Director
Minutes Approved:
Marjorie Harlow, President of Council
__________________________, 2008